Checkly vs UptimeRobot: Comparison

Quick Comparison

Feature Checkly UptimeRobot

Free tier Limited checks 50 monitors

Focus E2E + API monitoring Simple uptime

Browser checks Playwright/Puppeteer No

CI/CD integration Deep integration Basic

Monitoring as Code Yes (CLI) No

Pricing From $30/month From $7/month

When to Choose Checkly

E2E testing in production — Run Playwright/Puppeteer scripts on a schedule
Developer workflow — CLI-first, monitoring-as-code approach
API testing — Complex API checks with assertions and scripting
CI/CD integration — Run checks on every deploy

When to Choose UptimeRobot

Simple uptime monitoring — Just need to know if it's up or down
Budget-conscious — Much cheaper for basic monitoring
Many monitors needed — 50 free monitors is generous
Quick setup — No code needed, just point and click

Key Differences

Checkly's Approach

Checkly treats monitoring as code. You write JavaScript/TypeScript checks, store them in git, and deploy via CLI. It's built for developers who want Playwright-based E2E checks running in production.

UptimeRobot's Approach

UptimeRobot is point-and-click. Add a URL, set an interval, get alerts. No code required. It's simpler but less powerful for complex scenarios.

The Verdict

These tools serve different needs and aren't direct competitors.

Use Checkly if you need E2E browser testing, complex API testing, or want monitoring-as-code integrated into your CI/CD pipeline.

Use UptimeRobot if you just need simple, affordable uptime monitoring without writing code.

Many teams use both: Checkly for critical user flows, UptimeRobot for basic uptime across many endpoints.

More Comparisons

UptimeSignal vs Checkly UptimeSignal vs UptimeRobot UptimeRobot vs Pingdom

Checkly vs UptimeRobot