Comparison
Checkly excels at Playwright browser automation and monitoring-as-code. For simple HTTP endpoint monitoring, UptimeSignal is simpler and more cost-effective.
Checkly is a developer-first synthetic monitoring platform built around "monitoring as code." Founded in 2018, it focuses on programmable checks using Playwright and JavaScript/TypeScript.
Checkly is built for engineering teams who want to treat monitoring like code. It's ideal for organizations with complex web applications, dedicated QA processes, and CI/CD pipelines. The learning curve is higher, but the flexibility is substantial.
If you just need to check whether your API returns 200 OK, Checkly requires installing a CLI, writing configuration files, and understanding their check syntax. UptimeSignal takes 60 seconds: enter a URL, set your interval, done.
# Checkly setup
npm install checkly
npx checkly login
npx checkly init
# Edit checks, deploy...
# UptimeSignal setup
Enter URL → Click "Create" → Done
Checkly's usage-based pricing means costs scale with check volume and browser check minutes. This makes budgeting unpredictable, especially for growing teams. UptimeSignal is $15/month flat for unlimited monitors—no surprises.
Checkly (example: 50 monitors)
Team plan: ~$30-100+/mo
+ browser check minutes
UptimeSignal (50 monitors)
$15/mo flat
Same price for 500 monitors
Checkly doesn't offer status pages. If you want to share uptime information with customers, you need a separate tool. UptimeSignal includes unlimited public status pages at no extra cost.
Checkly's power comes from programmability—but that means writing and maintaining check scripts. UptimeSignal requires zero code. Configure everything through a visual dashboard, get alerts instantly.
Many teams get the best of both worlds by using UptimeSignal for basic HTTP monitoring and Checkly for complex browser tests:
This approach gives you comprehensive coverage while keeping costs predictable for the high-volume HTTP checks.
UptimeSignal focuses on simple HTTP endpoint monitoring with flat $15/month pricing for unlimited monitors. Checkly specializes in "monitoring as code" with Playwright browser automation, using usage-based pricing. Choose UptimeSignal for straightforward uptime monitoring, Checkly for complex browser-based synthetic testing.
For HTTP monitoring, yes. UptimeSignal costs $15/month flat for unlimited monitors with 1-minute checks. Checkly's usage-based pricing starts around $30/month for the Team plan and scales based on check runs and browser minutes. For simple HTTP monitoring at scale, UptimeSignal is significantly more cost-effective.
No. UptimeSignal focuses exclusively on HTTP endpoint monitoring—checking status codes, response times, and content. If you need full browser automation to test complex user flows (login sequences, checkout processes, JavaScript-rendered content), Checkly is the better choice.
Yes, many teams use both. UptimeSignal handles basic HTTP uptime monitoring (APIs, health endpoints, webhooks) at low cost, while Checkly handles complex browser-based E2E tests for critical user flows. This provides comprehensive coverage without overspending.
No, Checkly does not offer public status pages. UptimeSignal includes unlimited free status pages that you can share with customers. If you use Checkly and need status pages, you'd need a separate tool like Statuspage or Better Stack.
For simple API health checks (is it up? is it fast?), UptimeSignal is simpler and cheaper. For complex API testing with custom assertions, JavaScript validation, or multi-step authentication flows, Checkly's programmable checks offer more flexibility.
25 monitors, no credit card required, no Playwright scripts needed.
Start monitoring free →